P4m80p AWRDACPI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	P4m80p AWRDACPI (all builds)
Motherboard	P4M800-8237
Memory	1.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060215
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '19 at 05:57
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	PRI-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium D 3.40GHz 3,806 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Memory 49 1-Core 29.5 2-Core 59.1 30% 45.9 Pts	4-Core 58.5 8-Core 59.2 8% 58.8 Pts	64-Core 58.4 4% 58.4 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6200 1,060 User benchmarks, average bench 0% XFX(1682 2152) 256MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03.03E03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 69 77 70 80 80 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 76.9 Write 75.7 Mixed 50.8 SusWrite 73.1 51% 69.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 168% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 59%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183 4,107 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 234GB free Firmware: CT100-12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	Read 50.8 Write 63.4 Mixed 39.7 SusWrite 39.9 36% 48.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 42%
Sandisk SDCFX-008G 8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 7GB free Firmware: HDX 6.02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 47 50 48 49 49 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	Read 62.1 Write 50.1 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 48 30% 42.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 1.1 407% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 32%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB 1,070 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 6GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 9.7 10 9.9 11 10 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	6.37% Terrible	Read 19.5 Write 8.3 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 10.1 14% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.37% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	7.73% Terrible	MC Read 2.1 MC Write 2.2 MC Mixed 1.7 6% 2 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 2.3 8% 2.93 GB/s	Latency 164 24% 164 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.73% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AWRDACPI Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: P4m80p AWRDACPI

CPU
Pentium 4 2.80GHzIntel $15Bench 28%, 1,546 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 6200NvidiaBench 0%, 1,060 samples	1x

RAM
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $15

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

P4m80p AWRDACPI

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: P4m80p AWRDACPI

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)