Asus P7P55D DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P7P55D DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120928
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 23 '19 at 22:01
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 50.6
2-Core 142
56% 93.1 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 277
37% 278 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 27% Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 199 188 162 202 181 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.9% Average
Read 185
Write 207
Mixed 176
SusWrite 178
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 29.6
95% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 30.1
DQ Write 55.9
DQ Mixed 38.8
31% 41.6 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 134%
Seagate ST3400620NS 400GB-$179
244GB free
Firmware: 3.CNK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 72 72 73 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 69.5
Write 71
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 71.7
48% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 42%
Hitachi HTS 725050A7E630 500GB
353GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 12 11 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 30
Write 30.1
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 11.7
19% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 71%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB
154GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 84 84 84 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 86.2
Write 87.7
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 84
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 56%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
71GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 12 11 12 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 23.5
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 12
17% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.4
176% 2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 94%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB
112GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 19 17 15 16 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 19.2
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 16.3
28% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.1
150% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 37%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB
1.5TB free, PID ce17
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 27.8
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 11
32% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 14.2
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 10.5
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D DELUXE Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D DELUXE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $521
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback