Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DH87RL
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '19 at 20:07
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$185
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 74.9
2-Core 185
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 291
42% 308 Pts
64-Core 266
16% 266 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Asus(1043 84BE) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 20.4
18% 19.7 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 22.3
Splatting 16.4
17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$50
223GB free
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 205 142 122 154 154 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 426
Write 343
Mixed 290
SusWrite 186
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 17.4
72% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 94.6
DQ Mixed 45
51% 86.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55%
Great: 55%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
263GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 34 34 32 26 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 74.5
Write 84.3
Mixed 51
SusWrite 31.3
45% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 85%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$67
654GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 93 93 96 100 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 103
Write 101
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 96.7
68% 93 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KLN-4G Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.8% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.9
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,982 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback