PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus H61M-A (all builds) |
Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20140624 |
Uptime | 3.5 Days |
Run Date | Jul 12 '19 at 15:18 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | MYS-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
59%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
MSI(1462 320A) 2GB
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.78
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
18.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
495GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 67 54 56 93 91 MB/s
|
45.5%
Average
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
53GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 48 47 49 51 52 MB/s
|
30%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F Kingston 9905471-006.A01LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
49.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 37x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 30x |
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples | 22x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 39x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 23x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $88 |