Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD7  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130709
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 14 '19 at 15:22
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 75.9
2-Core 148
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 437
44% 355 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Lighting 65
Reflection 57.2
Parallax 83.7
53% 68.6 fps
MRender 58
Gravity 55.4
Splatting 74.7
53% 62.7 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 480GB-$81
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 210 43 42 47 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 411
Write 379
Mixed 321
SusWrite 92.3
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 29.9
105% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 155
140% 212 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 100%
Samsung HD642JI 640GB
538GB free
Firmware: 1AA01111
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 82 81 82 81 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 81
Write 42
Mixed 43
SusWrite 81.3
45% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 47%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58
350GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 79 79 79 79 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 117
Write 98
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 78.3
69% 93 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 76%
WD WD5000ABYS-01TNA0 500GB-$80
426GB free
Firmware: 12.01C01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 81 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 78.8
Write 76.3
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 80.4
54% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 47%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
539GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 82 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 85
Write 72.5
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 80.9
58% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
44.8% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 15.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 12.8
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD7 Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD7 - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $510
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback