Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '19 at 08:13
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 76
1-Core 114
2-Core 233
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 740
73% 598 Pts
64-Core 925
57% 925 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
MSI(1462 8A90) 2GB
CLim: 1203 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.6.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 15.5
Reflection 28.9
Parallax 19.7
13% 21.3 fps
MRender 28.9
Gravity 15
Splatting 32.8
22% 25.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$39
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 27 38 46 49 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 434
Write 246
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 66.7
43% 197 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 27.7
4K Mixed 11.8
60% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 76.2
DQ Write 11.8
DQ Mixed 10.9
16% 33 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 53%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$46
372GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 88 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 93.5
Write 91.8
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 87.5
62% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/8G KHX2666C15D4/4G 12GB
3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 27.8
94% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 27.7
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,631 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 133% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback