Asus P7P55D

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091207
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 19 '19 at 23:08
Run Duration	315 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	53%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	63% Good	Memory 91.7 1-Core 53.8 2-Core 101 54% 82.2 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 272 29% 230 Pts	64-Core 263 16% 263 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 6150) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	21.7% Poor	Lighting 24.7 Reflection 20.9 Parallax 26.9 20% 24.2 fps	MRender 34.6 Gravity 29.4 Splatting 28.1 25% 30.7 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 149GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 446GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 267 261 264 254 263 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.7% Average	Read 244 Write 253 Mixed 191 SusWrite 262 54% 238 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 24.9 4K Mixed 14.8 52% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 90.5 DQ Mixed 127 95% 129 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 99%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 116GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 67 65 66 66 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 103 Write 100 Mixed 70.3 SusWrite 65.6 63% 84.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 206% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 76%
Fujitsu MHX2250BT 250GB 300 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 173GB free Firmware: 0040000C SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Read 19.5 Write 18.5 Mixed 15 SusWrite 19.9 13% 18.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 21%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 165GB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 55 55 55 55 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 126 Write 127 Mixed 69.7 SusWrite 54.8 69% 94.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.1 132% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 92%
WD My Book 25DA 6TB 419 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 327GB free, PID 25da Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 39 39 39 42 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 147 Write 121 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 39.7 114% 92.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 133% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 67%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB 13,827 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 40 39 38 38 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 101 Write 101 Mixed 75.2 SusWrite 39.3 103% 79.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 100%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 256GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 235GB free, PID 0743 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 134 133 137 137 138 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	55.4% Above average	Read 133 Write 114 Mixed 105 SusWrite 133 164% 121 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 2.6 174% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 0, 0 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	40.5% Average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 14.4 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 9.2 25% 8.6 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D Builds (Compare 1,214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	397x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	252x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	178x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	62x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	55x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	45x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	27x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	402x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	377x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	168x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $159

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16