ADD TO PC
BUILD

Novatech PC-X009670

Performance Results


Gaming 131% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 135% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	329% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Novatech PC-X009670 (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF
Memory	23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181204
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '19 at 23:00
Run Duration	290 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$403 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	103% Outstanding	Memory 94.8 1-Core 130 2-Core 303 95% 176 Pts	4-Core 596 8-Core 1,185 105% 891 Pts	64-Core 1,606 99% 1,606 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 1E87) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.36 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	126% Outstanding	Lighting 171 Reflection 164 Parallax 172 139% 169 fps	MRender 188 Gravity 152 Splatting 109 118% 150 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$154 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 701GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2036 2050 1208 1188 1181 1182 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	329% Outstanding	Read 2,504 Write 2,306 Mixed 1,422 SusWrite 1,474 431% 1,926 MB/s	4K Read 58.4 4K Write 141 4K Mixed 81.8 268% 93.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,387 DQ Write 1,085 DQ Mixed 1,208 911% 1,226 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 329% Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 92GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 399 397 397 397 398 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 501 Write 481 Mixed 403 SusWrite 399 100% 446 MB/s	4K Read 46 4K Write 92.9 4K Mixed 58.5 194% 65.8 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 352 266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 213 218 215 216 219 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Read 118 Write 88.5 Mixed 74 SusWrite 215 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 106%
Toshiba MK2046GSX 200GB 419 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 16GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 37 40 39 38 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	20.4% Poor	Read 32 Write 30.5 Mixed 22 SusWrite 38.7 23% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 29%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400 2.5" 320GB-$35 9,368 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 187GB free Firmware: 0003DEM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 50 50 50 49 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 9% Great: 50%
Samsung SSD 840 Series 120GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 43GB free, PID 0611 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 44 55 62 58 54 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	113% Outstanding	Read 124 Write 68.5 Mixed 69 SusWrite 53.9 97% 78.8 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 25.9 4K Mixed 12.4 1,364% 18.3 MB/s	DQ Read 17.9 DQ Write 33.7 DQ Mixed 14.4 1,702% 22 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 143%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB 121 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 7GB free, PID ce17 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Read 38.5 Write 39.7 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 40.1 51% 37.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 19%
SAMSUNG HD103SJ 1TB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 20GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 4.2 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 34.5 Write 37.2 Mixed 31.5 SusWrite 4.6 35% 26.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 96% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 60%
ST332081 3AS 320GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 198GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16% Very poor	Read 32 Write 12.5 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 34.8 33% 25.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 029E CMR16GX4M2C3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	87.4% Excellent	MC Read 31.8 MC Write 33.5 MC Mixed 26.7 88% 30.7 GB/s	SC Read 19.1 SC Write 36.1 SC Mixed 27.2 78% 27.5 GB/s	Latency 57.6 70% 57.6 ns
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback