Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 86.5 2-Core 173 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 332 44% 332 Pts	64-Core 324 20% 324 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Dell(1028 04AD) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.04% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.46 Parallax 0.97 1% 1.18 fps	MRender 1.86 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 2 1% 1.55 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.04% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Valuegist ST-240G 240GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 149GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM91.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 116 115 119 116 120 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Read 401 Write 250 Mixed 310 SusWrite 131 61% 273 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 56.1 4K Mixed 25.6 107% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 327 DQ Mixed 164 157% 242 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 8GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	47.2% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 14.8 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 13.3 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,229x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	449x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	394x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	79x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	59x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	50x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16