PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 39.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z68 Pro3 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110708 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jul 30 '19 at 18:44 |
Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 73% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2300
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
59.3%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gainward(10B0 13C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 178 172 172 176 175 MB/s
|
60.1%
Good
|
|||
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
172GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 80 80 80 80 MB/s
|
33.6%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 99U5584-005.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
25.8%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 172x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 65x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 23x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 25x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 24x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 23x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $541 |