Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Compaq-presario VN292AA-UUZ CQ5227CH (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN ETON
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680x1050x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090925
Uptime	17.8 Days
Run Date	Aug 08 '19 at 11:23
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron E3200 981 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	37% Below average	Memory 63.7 1-Core 33.3 2-Core 62.9 36% 53.3 Pts	4-Core 63.8 8-Core 61.9 8% 62.8 Pts	64-Core 59.7 4% 59.7 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520 16,336 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.92% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 2.88 Parallax 1.91 2% 2.4 fps	MRender 2.62 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 1.96 2% 2.29 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.92% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 178 189 185 185 190 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.6% Average	Read 203 Write 83.2 Mixed 192 SusWrite 182 37% 165 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 31 4K Mixed 26 86% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 38.2 DQ Write 77.9 DQ Mixed 48.2 40% 54.8 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 2x2GB 524 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.2% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 4 12% 4.23 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 4.9 13% 4.4 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16