Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MZGLKAP-00 (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín, 1440x900x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181105
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '19 at 20:23
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4105 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 36% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Memory 39.2 1-Core 53.1 2-Core 105 37% 65.7 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 203 26% 198 Pts	64-Core 204 13% 204 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 42%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SK hynix SC311 SATA 512GB 5,047 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 445GB free (System drive) Firmware: 70000P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 317 314 318 320 314 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Read 345 Write 320 Mixed 311 SusWrite 318 73% 324 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 55.4 4K Mixed 34.7 110% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 352 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 326 246% 330 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Toshiba 9905711-017.A00G 2x4GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27% Poor	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 10.4 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4.1 11% 3.97 GB/s	Latency 206 19% 206 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4105IntelBench 36%, 1,216 samples	24x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	24x

SSD
M.2 PCIe SSD 256GBSpccBench 162%, 15,205 samples	3x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $92Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x

RAM
CT4G4SFS824A.C8FF 2x4GBCrucialBench 72%, 238 samples	3x
CT4G4SFS824A.C8FG 2x4GBCrucialBench 54%, 50 samples	3x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 72%, 322 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16