Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics79.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '19 at 22:37
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 200GE-$57
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Memory 66
1-Core 48.5
2-Core 93.2
44% 69.2 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 229
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 235
14% 235 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
Nvidia(10DE 1302) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.6% Very good
Lighting 78.8
Reflection 105
Parallax 174
64% 119 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 138
Splatting 105
109% 138 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 303 311 299 317 317 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 1,567
Write 1,196
Mixed 502
SusWrite 332
199% 899 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 42.1
141% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 683
DQ Write 377
DQ Mixed 480
370% 513 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 150%
Great: 236%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 850 500GB
461GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 118 128 125 135 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 324
Write 297
Mixed 264
SusWrite 125
57% 252 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 4.9
25% 6.9 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 99%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 860 1TB
508GB free
Firmware: RVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 117 127 125 135 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 315
Write 243
Mixed 289
SusWrite 125
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 9.8
34% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 94
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 130
115% 165 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 95%
Amd-raid Array 3 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 135 136 132 139 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 118
Write 138
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 136
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.6
172% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73%
Great: 285%
WD Elements 1TB
450GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 94 87 94 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 66.7
Write 68.5
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 91.7
93% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
74.8% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 27.4
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 11.9
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 859 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $965
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback