Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 18 '19 at 11:52
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
63% Good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 137
58% 95.5 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 371
38% 310 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63%
Great: 68%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
R5SL120G 120GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2204
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 251
Write 112
Mixed 218
43% 194 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 22.4
100% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 135
120% 179 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 89%
AMD Radeon R3 240GB
65GB free
Firmware: P0901A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 458
Write 386
Mixed 340
88% 395 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 34.1
110% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 215
168% 230 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 90%
AMD Radeon R3 120GB
10GB free
Firmware: P0422C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 452
Write 267
Mixed 327
77% 349 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 33
110% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 206
165% 231 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 87%
Spcc Solid State Disk 60GB
47GB free
Firmware: S9FM02.8
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 414
Write 158
Mixed 199
56% 257 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 20.5
92% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 86.6
DQ Mixed 8.9
31% 67.8 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 70%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
2GB free
Firmware: 1AC01113
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 97
Write 68.8
Mixed 60.5
56% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Tph00500500gb 8 500GB
144GB free
Firmware: JC2OR39G
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 70.2
Write 55.2
Mixed 37
40% 54.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 62%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
0GB free
Firmware: CP10
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,229
Write 6.8
Mixed 14.5
536% 750 MB/s
4K Read 256
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
10,765% 85.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 43%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
9GB free
Firmware: 1AC0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,254
Write 23
Mixed 46.3
555% 774 MB/s
4K Read 258
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 2.4
11,024% 87.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
202GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,314
Write 20.5
Mixed 38.2
566% 791 MB/s
4K Read 257
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
10,786% 86.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 77%
Tph00500 500GB 8 500GB
315GB free
Firmware: JC2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 30 32 31 30 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 83.5
Write 55.5
Mixed 37
SusWrite 30.9
38% 51.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
40.9% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 11.5
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $687
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback