Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B75M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '19 at 23:53
Run Duration427 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 211
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 514
54% 431 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3684) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56% Above average
Lighting 70.7
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 62.8
58% 67.7 fps
MRender 74.4
Gravity 63.8
Splatting 58.1
53% 65.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$67
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 191 145 148 148 140 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.9% Above average
Read 215
Write 209
Mixed 139
SusWrite 164
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 29.6
94% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 29.8
DQ Write 86.6
DQ Mixed 30.2
31% 48.9 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 117%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB
516GB free
Firmware: CC96
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 96 95 93 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 79.3
Write 77.5
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 93.7
51% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 74%
Seagate Desktop 3TB
2TB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 12.3
Write 18.7
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 19.2
25% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
75% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 21%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
191GB free, PID 3320
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 32
Write 25.5
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 19.2
33% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
47% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905584-012.A00LF 9905584-012.A00LF 99U5584-008.A00LF 99U5584-008.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.9% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 17.2
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 19.2
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B75M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $405
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback