Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '16 at 09:45
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$45
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 89
1-Core 103
2-Core 194
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 204
26% 200 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Sapphire(174B E266) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.101.8.0
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.26% Terrible
Lighting 6.93
Reflection 9.38
Parallax 8.84
6% 8.39 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 10
7% 8.99 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.26%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Richdisk device 500GB
37GB free
Firmware: 1010
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 84
Write 61.9
Mixed 70.9
16% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 9.29
4K Mixed 5.05
27% 8.13 MB/s
DQ Read 9.74
DQ Write 9.09
DQ Mixed 5.58
5% 8.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 15%
Richdisk device 43GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40.7% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 11.6
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 11.9
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-DS2-CF Builds (Compare 2,374 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback