Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$129 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.25 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	61% Good	Memory 90.6 1-Core 31.7 2-Core 65.2 45% 62.5 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 454 35% 312 Pts	64-Core 444 28% 444 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85B6) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.30 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.1% Average	Lighting 56.6 Reflection 67.9 Parallax 64.1 46% 62.9 fps	MRender 68.9 Gravity 66.5 Splatting 66.1 55% 67.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 490 Write 451 Mixed 444 103% 462 MB/s	4K Read 38.4 4K Write 70.6 4K Mixed 48.7 158% 52.6 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 62.3 DQ Mixed 22.8 38% 77.1 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 48GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 113 120 125 131 132 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	69.6% Good	Read 119 Write 97 Mixed 86.2 SusWrite 123 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1 204% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KRE-D3U1600M/ Kingston KHX1600C10D3/ 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 800, 800 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	47.4% Average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 15.5 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 12.2 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 66.4 60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	148x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	68x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 39%, 4,786 samples	62x

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $366

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16