Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190703
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 27 '19 at 13:54
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 73.4 1-Core 98.1 2-Core 195 69% 122 Pts	4-Core 393 8-Core 780 69% 586 Pts	64-Core 1,073 66% 1,073 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30% Below average	Lighting 36.5 Reflection 30.8 Parallax 36.1 30% 34.5 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 38.3 Splatting 36.1 31% 37.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,215 Write 1674 Mixed 855 348% 1,581 MB/s	4K Read 48.3 4K Write 140 4K Mixed 61.6 226% 83.2 MB/s	DQ Read 795 DQ Write 688 DQ Mixed 729 550% 737 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Amd-raid Array 1 4TB 1,316 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 182GB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 146 143 141 143 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	94.6% Outstanding	Read 189 Write 100 Mixed 88.7 SusWrite 140 95% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.1 120% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 207%
Amd-raid ST1000DL002-9TT1 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 107GB free Firmware: CC3C SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 69 69 70 69 71 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 67.8 Write 68.3 Mixed 49 SusWrite 68.8 47% 63.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 65%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 1TB 3,837 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 669GB free Firmware: 0302 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 109 109 108 109 109 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	60% Good	Read 102 Write 71 Mixed 57 SusWrite 107 62% 84.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 63%
Amd-raid Array 3 2TB 122 User benchmarks, average bench 137% 487GB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 118 118 118 117 119 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Read 131 Write 166 Mixed 73 SusWrite 116 89% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.9 333% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 219%
General UDisk 1GB 1GB free, PID 1234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.1 7.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	4.93% Terrible	Read 12.3 Write 5.3 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 7.6 9% 7.35 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 23% 2.1 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x16GB 472 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	MC Read 32.1 MC Write 30.3 MC Mixed 28 86% 30.1 GB/s	SC Read 21.6 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 26.7 77% 27 GB/s	Latency 93.7 43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	43x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	19x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBAdata $86Bench 279%, 85,928 samples	8x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $730

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)