Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory335.8 GB free of 384 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1745 x 797 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 30 '19 at 21:12
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8180
CPU #000, 6 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.4% Good
Memory 60.3
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 174
61% 110 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 519
57% 452 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 13 12 19 19 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 28.9
Mixed 15
SusWrite 16.9
17% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 85%
Vmware Virtual disk 215GB
143GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 10 11 17 19 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
7.21% Terrible
Read 8.5
Write 8.5
Mixed 8.8
SusWrite 16
8% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 7.21%
Great: 94%
Vmware Virtual disk 215GB
80GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 15 12 17 18 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 43.8
Write 37.5
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 16.5
24% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.2
177% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 94%
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
90GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 15 12 19 19 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 27.1
Write 24.3
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 17.4
22% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 85%
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
70GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 16 6.7 17 19 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
6.09% Terrible
Read 4.5
Write 24
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 16.3
10% 13.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.1
159% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 6.09%
Great: 85%
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
90GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 16 12 19 20 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 38.1
Write 24.4
Mixed 19.4
SusWrite 17.8
18% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
27% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16%
Great: 85%
Vmware Virtual disk 891GB
62GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 16 12 19 19 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.6% Very poor
Read 25.8
Write 31.4
Mixed 34
SusWrite 17.8
20% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.3
199% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 24x16GB
24 of 128 slots used
384GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
64.5% Good
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 26.5
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 6
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 160%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,806 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback