Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display892 x 655 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateSep 02 '20 at 21:38
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8180
CPU #000, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74% Very good
Memory 74.3
1-Core 109
2-Core 220
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 430
57% 427 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 268GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 25 25 19 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 196
Write 53.5
Mixed 122
SusWrite 23.1
74% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 2
412% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 86%
Vmware Virtual disk 322GB
151GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 25 24 19 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 148
Write 109
Mixed 107
SusWrite 22.1
72% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 2.2
410% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 62.1
MC Mixed 33.3
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 9.9
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,823 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback