Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics62.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive322% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming X  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190910
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 09 '19 at 02:51
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Memory 84.8
1-Core 151
2-Core 301
97% 179 Pts
4-Core 589
8-Core 1,018
97% 804 Pts
64-Core 1,458
90% 1,458 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200
CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.9% Good
Lighting 79
Reflection 79.2
Parallax 97.7
64% 85.3 fps
MRender 78.5
Gravity 79.5
Splatting 65.4
60% 74.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2169 810 826 833 839 835 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
322% Outstanding
Read 2,706
Write 2,630
Mixed 1,917
SusWrite 1,052
465% 2,076 MB/s
4K Read 69.6
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 94.6
314% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1259
DQ Write 1062
DQ Mixed 1,171
874% 1,164 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 322%
Great: 355%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 860 512GB
435GB free
Firmware: RVM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 105 109 107 97 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 432
Write 416
Mixed 382
SusWrite 104
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 33.2
109% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 57.8
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 81.3
74% 109 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 83%
Amd-raid Array 3 1TB
691GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 109 108 97 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 134
Write 112
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 100
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.1
108% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 105%
Amd-raid ST32000644NS 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SN12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 108 106 95 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 139
Write 138
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 99.8
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
216% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 69%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 105 105 105 106 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 99.6
Write 97.8
Mixed 79
SusWrite 104
129% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 49%
WD 0644NS External 2TB
2TB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 39 40 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 38.5
Write 36.8
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 39.5
48% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3466 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
97% Outstanding
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 39.3
100% 34.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 37.7
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 97%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming X Builds (Compare 230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 171%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 195%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $1,495
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback