| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180820 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 12 '19 at 14:23 |
| Run Duration | 218 Seconds |
| Run User | AUS-User |
| Background CPU | 23% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
73.7%
Very good
|
73% 132 Pts
|
63% 510 Pts
|
50% 812 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(107D 2770) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.64
|
56.5%
Above average
|
57% 70.3 fps
|
56% 68.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
594GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 891 501 500 500 501 501 MB/s
|
||||
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
633GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 25 31 32 MB/s
|
16.2%
Very poor
|
20% 27.1 MB/s
|
38% 0.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT16G4DFD8266.M16FD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.6%
Below average
|
37% 12.8 GB/s
|
33% 11.5 GB/s
|
42% 94.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,071 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 1,466x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 1,308x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 1,008x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 950x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 736x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 654x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 99% - Outstanding | Total price: $347 |