Alienware Aurora-R3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora-R3  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 046MHW
Memory2.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110525
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 13 '19 at 20:01
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 57%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$189
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 84
2-Core 159
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 462
43% 359 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
9.11% Terrible
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 11.5
9% 11.1 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 11.1
10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 9.11%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LAT-256M2S 256GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PNDA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 300
Write 213
Mixed 205
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 12.1
42% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 69.3
DQ Write 35.7
DQ Mixed 40.7
33% 48.6 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 56%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
69GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 98 100 94 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 154
Write 153
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 96.7
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72%
Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
105GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 27 26 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 31
Write 25.3
Mixed 20
SusWrite 26.2
34% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
40.3% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 13.5
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 11.2
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R3 Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Alienware Aurora-R3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $585
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback