Intel DX58SO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemINTEL_ DX58SO__
MotherboardIntel DX58SO  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '19 at 10:11
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
J1PR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 80
2-Core 160
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 406
42% 338 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Nvidia(10DE 098F) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 375.70
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.87% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 5.62
Parallax 3.56
4% 4.69 fps
MRender 5.62
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 3.48
4% 4.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.87%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$30
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DEM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 34 30 28 31 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 52.8
Write 53.3
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 27
31% 41.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 43%
Toshiba MK1637GS 160GB
101GB free
Firmware: 2C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 36.8
Write 38.8
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 37.7
26% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
null MHz
2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
36.7% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 10.9
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 10.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DX58SO Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel DX58SO - $246

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $495
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback