Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds)
Memory	13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180418
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 22 '19 at 00:55
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 5,123 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Memory 81 1-Core 71.1 2-Core 140 59% 97.4 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 617 57% 475 Pts	64-Core 841 52% 841 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NE-256 256GB 6,044 User benchmarks, average bench 159% 212GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0620A SusWrite @10s intervals: 1062 1084 228 164 164 135 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	147% Outstanding	Read 1,283 Write 1,033 Mixed 829 SusWrite 473 202% 904 MB/s	4K Read 37.1 4K Write 85.1 4K Mixed 35.5 147% 52.6 MB/s	DQ Read 517 DQ Write 478 DQ Mixed 509 379% 501 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 147% Great: 234%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 737GB free Firmware: 0706 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 29 30 30 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Read 29.9 Write 29.9 Mixed 17.8 SusWrite 29.9 20% 26.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.1 103% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung F6451U64F9333 F6451U64F9333 Kingston 99U5474-038.A Kingston 99U5474-038.A 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	79% Very good	MC Read 35.6 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 28.9 88% 30.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 10.3 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 78.7 51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 80%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 40%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

RAM
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	34x
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	31x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	23x

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $130

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16