HP Z220 CMT Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Z220 CMT Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1790
Memory	27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130207
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 22 '19 at 03:59
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 80.4 1-Core 106 2-Core 207 74% 131 Pts	4-Core 344 8-Core 510 53% 427 Pts	64-Core 506 31% 506 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% XFX(1682 7240) ≥ 4GB CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 667 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	5.25% Terrible	Lighting 6.57 Reflection 7.77 Parallax 8.53 5% 7.62 fps	MRender 5.38 Gravity 6 Splatting 6.83 5% 6.07 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.25% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU750 1TB 2,753 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 868GB free (System drive) Firmware: XA011R17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 204 203 205 201 203 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.1% Average	Read 240 Write 200 Mixed 208 SusWrite 203 48% 213 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 14.5 4K Mixed 17.9 66% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 73.8 DQ Mixed 103 84% 124 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 111%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 464GB free Firmware: 20.01H20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Read 122 Write 38.8 Mixed 46 SusWrite 39.8 45% 61.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 103% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 69%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB 18,390 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 489GB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 19.5 Write 19.2 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 18.3 15% 20.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.4 133% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 63%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 2TB-$58 5,099 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2TB free Firmware: GA0A SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 179 178 181 181 181 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 158 Mixed 86.8 SusWrite 180 110% 150 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.1 228% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 104%
WD My Book 25DA 5TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 4TB free, PID 25da Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 24 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 16.1 31% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B1G73QH0-CK0 M378B1G73QH0-CK0 M378B1G73QH0-CK0 32GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.9% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 16 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 17.7 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z220 CMT Workstation Builds (Compare 1,303 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: HP Z220 CMT Workstation

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	616x
Xeon E3-1225 V2Intel $248Bench 70%, 2,869 samples	158x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	108x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	101x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	73x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	71x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	42x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 2,354 samples	33x
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 4x4GBMicronBench 55%, 1,512 samples	25x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16