Today's hottest deals

HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory9.2 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100913
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 25 '19 at 02:16
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 59.4
2-Core 124
54% 87.1 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 385
39% 315 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST330006CLAR3000 3TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: YS18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 25 31 21 21 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 75.5
Write 36
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 25.8
33% 44.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
108% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 57%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
12GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 5.2 11 7.2 4.5 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
9.25% Terrible
Read 32.7
Write 21.7
Mixed 11.8
SusWrite 8
22% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
67% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.25%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 46GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.1% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 16.5
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 5.2
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,232 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback