Asus B85M-G PLUS/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus B85M-G PLUS/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150402
Uptime	5.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 26 '19 at 14:07
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Memory 90.5 1-Core 122 2-Core 221 83% 144 Pts	4-Core 395 8-Core 632 63% 514 Pts	64-Core 635 39% 635 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$79 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 232GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,612 Write 4872 Mixed 940 699% 3,141 MB/s	4K Read 471 4K Write 260 4K Mixed 320 1,260% 350 MB/s	DQ Read 1,100 DQ Write 842 DQ Mixed 910 697% 951 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 54GB free Firmware: 0A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 84 86 86 86 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 85.3 Write 86 Mixed 66 SusWrite 84.6 59% 80.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 54%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 234GB free Firmware: 1D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 38 37 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 112 Write 38.5 Mixed 47 SusWrite 37.2 43% 58.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 76%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 292GB free Firmware: 1A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 104 105 105 105 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	79.9% Very good	Read 174 Write 171 Mixed 91.5 SusWrite 104 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 109%
WD Green 750GB (2009)-$60 5,100 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 335GB free Firmware: 0A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 89 90 90 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Read 92.7 Write 85.3 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 89.5 62% 83.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 0423 Team-Elite-1600 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56.9% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 16.3 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 22.2 SC Mixed 19.1 54% 18.9 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-G PLUS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G PLUS/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	11x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	6x
Core i5-4440Intel $99Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	8x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	4x
GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples	3x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	5x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	4x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	4x

RAM
CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 0215 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 0215 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 16GBUnknownBench 55%, 27 samples	3x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	3x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 26,466 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $332

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16