Asus H87-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H87-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141015
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '19 at 14:17
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670-$51 49,019 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 103 2-Core 198 76% 130 Pts	4-Core 346 8-Core 407 49% 376 Pts	64-Core 389 24% 389 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 77%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 151 151 151 151 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 447 Write 450 Mixed 334 SusWrite 184 79% 354 MB/s	4K Read 38.6 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 57.6 187% 66.3 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 354 268% 360 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 115%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 402GB free Firmware: JP4OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 100 102 113 112 106 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Read 103 Write 104 Mixed 55.3 SusWrite 108 68% 92.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 74%
ELECOM MF-MSU3 8GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 3GB free, PID 6015 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 6.6 6.9 7.2 6.9 7.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	2.95% Terrible	Read 9.5 Write 8 Mixed 11.2 SusWrite 7.1 12% 8.95 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 2.95% Great: 21%
BUFFALO HD-PVU2 500GB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 466GB free, PID 0181 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 41 42 42 42 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Read 40.2 Write 40.7 Mixed 28 SusWrite 41.7 51% 37.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR3 1600 2x4GB 3,616 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.5% Below average	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 8.7 28% 9.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 8.7 26% 9.1 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87-PLUS Builds (Compare 850 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87-PLUS - $128

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	216x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	145x
Core i5-4670Intel $51Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	91x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	94x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	55x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	42x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	49x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	35x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	26x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	33x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $298

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16