Today's hottest deals

Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '19 at 10:49
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 143
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 418
41% 336 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Nvidia(10DE 098A) 1.5GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 347.88
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 24.6
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 30.3
20% 27.5 fps
Gravity 24.5
Splatting 25.9
22% 25.2 fps
Poor: 18% Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0705AB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 106 51 51 51 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 363
Write 359
Mixed 311
SusWrite 83.7
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 37.3
123% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 32.7
DQ Write 84.6
DQ Mixed 44.7
38% 54 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 92%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
285GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 494 468 469 468 447 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
148GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 58 59 59 59 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 63.8
Write 64.2
Mixed 44.8
SusWrite 57.9
43% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 44%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
542GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 58 59 59 59 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 95.9
Write 107
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 57.9
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 16GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
45.4% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 15.3
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11.8
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $351
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback