Today's hottest deals

Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '20 at 13:50
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 73.1
1-Core 70.2
2-Core 142
56% 95.2 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 419
42% 340 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
Gigabyte(1458 230F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1314 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48.1% Average
Lighting 59.2
Reflection 67.8
Parallax 74.8
48% 67.3 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 57.7
Splatting 54.1
48% 59 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 0 0 0 0 209 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74
32GB free
Firmware: P0705AB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 110 49 49 49 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 361
Write 394
Mixed 323
SusWrite 78.8
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 35
114% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 32.3
DQ Write 81.1
DQ Mixed 44.1
37% 52.5 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 92%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
120GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 61 60 60 61 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 54.4
Write 58.5
Mixed 40.9
SusWrite 58.7
39% 53.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 44%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
403GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 61 60 60 61 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 132
Write 139
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 58.6
71% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 72%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
301GB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 89 89 88 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 49
Write 136
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 89.3
125% 85 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.1
32% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 16GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.6% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.5
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 9.1
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $351
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback