Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dell Precision Tower 7810
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 7810 (all builds)
Memory	123.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181213
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '19 at 20:52
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 1,417 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Memory 86.8 1-Core 86.4 2-Core 195 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 694 62% 526 Pts	64-Core 1,351 84% 1,351 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 8667) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	132% Outstanding	Lighting 154 Reflection 203 Parallax 249 126% 202 fps	MRender 269 Gravity 220 Splatting 145 166% 212 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 174%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150 16,934 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVM01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 400 Write 322 Mixed 239 71% 320 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 61.9 4K Mixed 39.6 131% 44.4 MB/s	DQ Read 41.7 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 57 49% 69.5 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Pro 2TB-$474 2,198 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 225GB free Firmware: RVM01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 344 Write 317 Mixed 287 70% 316 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 42.3 4K Mixed 31.2 100% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 27.4 DQ Write 83.5 DQ Mixed 56.6 43% 55.8 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 131%
Samsung PM851a 2.5 7mm 1024GB 306 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 107GB free Firmware: EXV01D0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 387 Write 312 Mixed 253 70% 317 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 61.9 4K Mixed 31.3 109% 39 MB/s	DQ Read 32 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 42 39% 58.4 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 112%
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300 8,179 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 242GB free Firmware: RVM01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 400 Write 318 Mixed 323 77% 347 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 61.4 4K Mixed 42.1 136% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 43 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 57.6 48% 67.4 MB/s
Poor: 85% Great: 132%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA84GR7MFR4N-TF 4x31.8GB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 4 of 8 slots used 127GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	MC Read 57.7 MC Write 43.5 MC Mixed 46.6 141% 49.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 20.9 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 124%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	143x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	115x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples	88x

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	137x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	121x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	80x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $62Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	39x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	31x
SM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 1,320 samples	27x

RAM
HMA41GR7AFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 95%, 876 samples	82x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	62x
M393A1G43DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 97%, 963 samples	46x

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $62

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16