Lenovo 20266

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 74% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20266  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Yoga2
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '16 at 14:42
Run Duration305 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 74%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4500U-$393
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 82.2
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 147
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 213
28% 212 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3978) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4444
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.67% Terrible
Lighting 3.73
Reflection 6.31
Parallax 6.5
3% 5.51 fps
MRender 7.62
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.52
5% 5.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.67%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series mSATA 256GB-$167
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HTLAN103 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 488
Write 448
Mixed 481
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 9.73
4K Write 21.6
4K Mixed 9.03
38% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 9.97
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 65.4
59% 83.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 92%
LEXAR JD FIREFLY 2GB
2GB free, PID a701
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
3.83% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 4.15
Mixed 6.03
9% 8.24 MB/s
4K Read 3.26
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
13% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.83%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 0h clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
54% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 16.3
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 18.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20266 Builds (Compare 253 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20266

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback