Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '19 at 17:31
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$163
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 88.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 220
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 663
71% 566 Pts
64-Core 656
41% 656 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1355 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 96.2
55% 77.5 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 69.2
Splatting 55.8
52% 65.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900BB3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 416 430 421 415 404 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 387
Write 342
Mixed 371
SusWrite 418
86% 379 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 35.5
142% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 205
178% 260 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
466GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 120 121 121 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 124
Write 120
Mixed 77
SusWrite 120
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 69%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
25GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.6 16 15 14 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 40.4
Write 31.3
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 13.4
32% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 76.C102G.D170B 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.3% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 18.4
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 21
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $884
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback