Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705FD_N705FD

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705FD_N705FD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X705FD
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190704
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '19 at 16:59
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	1%
CPU Throttled	90%

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8565U 81,207 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	Memory 93.5 1-Core 142 2-Core 280 95% 172 Pts	4-Core 455 8-Core 623 68% 539 Pts	64-Core 614 38% 614 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Asus(1043 1431) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2546 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	Lighting 33.7 Reflection 25.5 Parallax 29.7 27% 29.6 fps	MRender 34.3 Gravity 32 Splatting 22.7 24% 29.7 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G1102 128GB 2,914 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6106002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 109 96 97 87 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 467 Write 434 Mixed 284 SusWrite 100 72% 321 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 59.7 4K Mixed 36.2 123% 41.9 MB/s	DQ Read 304 DQ Write 220 DQ Mixed 206 169% 244 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 93%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 930GB free Firmware: SDM4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 131 130 130 126 127 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Read 99.1 Write 102 Mixed 54.1 SusWrite 128 70% 95.7 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM2666HSB-8G Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2667, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 30.4 MC Mixed 21.9 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 32.4 SC Mixed 25.1 73% 25.6 GB/s	Latency 61.1 66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705FD_N705FD Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705FD_N705FD

CPU
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	107x
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	6x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	77x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	36x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	53x
SD9SN8W128G1102 128GBSandiskBench 67%, 2,914 samples	11x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	8x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	63x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	18x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16