Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	37.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 99 2-Core 192 75% 127 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 337 44% 331 Pts	64-Core 377 23% 377 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingmax 120GB 120GB 2,908 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: M1009 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 49 50 57 56 57 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.7% Below average	Read 67.6 Write 81 Mixed 78.3 SusWrite 54.1 16% 70.2 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 61.7 4K Mixed 23.1 92% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 86 DQ Write 82.5 DQ Mixed 77 60% 81.8 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 86%
Netac OnlyDisk 16GB 131 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID 3700 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 15 6 10 21 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	7.82% Terrible	Read 25.7 Write 11 Mixed 7 SusWrite 15.4 18% 14.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.82% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingmax FLGF65F-D8KMB 1x4GB 330 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	32% Below average	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 9.1 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 9.6 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	34x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	31x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	24x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	16x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	15x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	13x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $571

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16