Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	12.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 624 User benchmarks, average bench 48% None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Memory 70.2 1-Core 78.1 2-Core 154 59% 101 Pts	4-Core 307 8-Core 289 40% 298 Pts	64-Core 229 14% 229 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 64%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Virtual HD 136GB 509 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 26 19 26 27 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	12.6% Very poor	Read 39.2 Write 37.3 Mixed 38.6 SusWrite 25.1 8% 35 MB/s	4K Read 8.6 4K Write 9.7 4K Mixed 8.3 29% 8.87 MB/s	DQ Read 14.9 DQ Write 8.8 DQ Mixed 8.1 7% 10.6 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 78%
Virtual HD 34GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 30GB free Firmware: 1.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 10 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	8.84% Terrible	Read 14.7 Write 12.3 Mixed 34.8 SusWrite 11.7 14% 18.4 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 6.4 1,137% 6.67 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.84% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% null MHz 1024, 15360 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	60.7% Good	MC Read 23.4 MC Write 24.2 MC Mixed 20.9 65% 22.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 15.5 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,059x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	829x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	432x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325