Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory51.7 GB free of 56 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '21 at 01:08
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
None, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 54.7
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 176
54% 100 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 433
50% 391 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 136GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 41 41 17 34 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 408
Write 46.4
Mixed 298
SusWrite 34.7
43% 197 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 0
32% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 400
DQ Write 50.8
DQ Mixed 5.1
60% 152 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37%
Great: 78%
Virtual HD 365GB
332GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 371 371 364 367 355 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 551
Write 380
Mixed 422
SusWrite 366
96% 430 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 13.1
52% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 243
166% 202 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 56GB
null MHz
1024, 32767, 23553 MB
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 46
119% 41.5 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.1
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 102%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,003 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback