Supermicro X9SRG-F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro X9SRG-F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9SRG-F
Memory34.6 GB free of 64.0078 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130801
Uptime49.1 Days
Run DateNov 26 '19 at 20:11
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-4620 v2
CPU, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Memory 57.4
1-Core 28.2
2-Core 59.6
32% 48.4 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 279
22% 196 Pts
64-Core 703
44% 703 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 71%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 250GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 156 111 90 89 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 795
Write 308
Mixed 276
SusWrite 138
83% 379 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 19.2
4K Mixed 13.5
49% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 109
106% 165 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 265%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4C Kingston 9965426-170.A HMT31GR7CFR4C Kingston 9965426-170.A HMT31GR7CFR4C Kingston 9965426-170.A HMT31GR7CFR4C Kingston 9965426-170.A Winbond 25X/Q S... 64GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 33 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.7% Excellent
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 33.8
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.8
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 136
30% 136 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback