Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics47.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE II  (all builds)
Memory22.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161109
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 03 '16 at 09:48
Run Duration656 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 254
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 824
81% 661 Pts
64-Core 984
61% 984 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 372.90
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.5% Average
Lighting 57.6
Reflection 64.7
Parallax 52.1
47% 58.1 fps
MRender 72.7
Gravity 53.9
Splatting 54.7
49% 60.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PM RAID5 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: 0959 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.5% Below average
Read 221
Write 149
Mixed 146
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 9.11
54% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 26.2
DQ Write 12.1
DQ Mixed 8.75
9% 15.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 34%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$75
611GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 67% Great: 104%
H/W RAID 1 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0210 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 19% Great: 97%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109
2TB free
Firmware: 0210 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109
2TB free
Firmware: 82.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 88%
H/W RAID 0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0210 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 233
Write 235
Mixed 190
164% 219 MB/s
4K Read 1.61
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.39
135% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 134%
Great: 193%
H/W RAID 1 2TB
871GB free
Firmware: 0210 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 107%
H/W RAID 5 9TB
7TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 85%
H/W RAID 5 9TB
4.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 36% Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3333 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 55.8
MC Mixed 45.9
138% 48.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 21.9
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 123%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 867 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $856
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback