Asrock Z170 Extreme4+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
17 days ago, 8 days ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z170 Extreme4+  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150701
Uptime14 Days
Run DateNov 27 '19 at 16:37
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-6600K-$200
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
62.1% Good
1-Core 104
2-Core 210
74% 157 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 359
45% 334 Pts
64-Core 374
25% 374 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
ASRock(1849 1912) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
5.49% Terrible
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 24.9
Parallax 21.1
5% 22.2 fps
MRender 20.2
Gravity 18.3
Splatting 30.8
6% 23.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.49%
Great: 7%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$100
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 476
Write 448
Mixed 303
91% 409 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 53.3
184% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 313
241% 328 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 117%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
113GB free
Firmware: CR100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 53 53 54 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 63.5
Write 30.2
Mixed 26
SusWrite 53.4
32% 43.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 45%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$96
578GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 57 57 57 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 58.5
Write 64.7
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 56.9
43% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
541GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 116 117 119 118 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 103
Write 71
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 118
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 115%
Generic Mass-Storage 128GB
68GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 18 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 14.8
Write 18.2
Mixed 16
SusWrite 16.8
23% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 3.2
201% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
72.6% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 22.1
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 21.1
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 89%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z170 Extreme4+ Builds (Compare 157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock Z170 Extreme4+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $1,293
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $55
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback