Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD7  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130709
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 27 '19 at 23:08
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 132
59% 95 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 299
31% 251 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Lighting 70.3
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 62.8
57% 67.2 fps
MRender 74.1
Gravity 66
Splatting 57.4
53% 65.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 331 375 368 367 318 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 432
Write 408
Mixed 318
SusWrite 346
85% 376 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 36.5
121% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 262
188% 243 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 134%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 209 206 220 212 208 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 223
Write 227
Mixed 104
SusWrite 209
139% 191 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 2
376% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 124%
Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 992124R (9971 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
45.2% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 16.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 13
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD7 Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD7 - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $510
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback