ADD TO PC
BUILD

IBM 69Y4438

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	168GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 168GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	IBM 69Y4438 (all builds)
Memory	161.8 GB free of 168 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180604
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '19 at 05:52
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650 7,756 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	66.6% Good	Memory 83.4 1-Core 67.9 2-Core 135 58% 95.4 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 436 43% 353 Pts	64-Core 1,004 62% 1,004 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600 8,087 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 094B) 1GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.30 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.8% Terrible	Lighting 4.23 Reflection 4.04 Parallax 4.34 4% 4.21 fps	MRender 4.95 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.96 4% 5.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.8% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 479GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 173% 292GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 184 184 183 184 184 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Read 395 Write 287 Mixed 307 SusWrite 183 66% 293 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 29.4 4K Mixed 17.9 57% 19.8 MB/s	DQ Read 255 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 226 170% 228 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 316%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 2TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 139% 1.5TB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 266 266 266 266 265 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	96.7% Outstanding	Read 568 Write 597 Mixed 579 SusWrite 268 113% 503 MB/s	4K Read 50 4K Write 41.4 4K Mixed 43.5 153% 45 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 239 DQ Mixed 207 162% 222 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 172%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 511GB 333GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 28 27 27 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	134% Outstanding	Read 433 Write 28.6 Mixed 59.5 SusWrite 27.4 100% 137 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 2.4 1,087% 7.6 MB/s

WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 3TB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 103 103 102 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 120 Write 105 Mixed 68.3 SusWrite 102 131% 99.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 0.5 215% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 168GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 59% null MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.9% Below average	MC Read 14 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 12 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 8.8 25% 8.7 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 124%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical 69Y4438 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: IBM 69Y4438

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E56451stBench 59%, 1,766 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56771stBench 73%, 417 samples	1x
Xeon E5620IntelBench 59%, 3,527 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	1x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x
GeForce GTX 1060 3GBNvidiaBench 52%, 5,957 samples	1x

SSD
MZFLV256HCHP-000MV 256GBSamsungBench 98%, 8,268 samples	1x
ServeRAID M5014 478GBIBMBench 78%, 8 samples	1x
Extreme SSD 500GBSandiskBench 67%, 4,692 samples	1x

RAM
18x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 86 samples	1x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	1x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback