Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	316% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Supermicro X8DT3
Memory	15.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110830
Uptime	5.8 Days
Run Date	Apr 30 '17 at 13:47
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU 2, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Memory 94.6 1-Core 68.1 2-Core 171 66% 111 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 571 57% 464 Pts	64-Core 1,354 84% 1,354 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 381.89 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.7% Average	Lighting 61.1 Reflection 68.8 Parallax 59.9 50% 63.3 fps	MRender 71.6 Gravity 57.8 Splatting 54.8 50% 61.4 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 479GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 173% 349GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0. Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	316% Outstanding	Read 2,424 Write 2,809 Mixed 2,742 597% 2,658 MB/s	4K Read 46.5 4K Write 41.4 4K Mixed 29.9 131% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 86.4 94% 156 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 316% Great: 316%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$150 40,945 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1TB free Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 99 3987004 (03) Spinup time 100 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3359 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 12 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 226800250 (09) Power-on hours count 63 63 33105 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 14 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1282 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295163908 (BD) vendor-specific 62 62 38 (BE) vendor-specific 65 47 638713891 (C2) HDA temperature 35 53 47244640291 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 12 9 3987004 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 130927783082628 (F1) Unknown 100 253 4281317428 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3342180022	62% Good	Read 104 Write 112 Mixed 104 80% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.52 111% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 70%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$36 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 570GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 155 154 5233 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 387 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 43 43 41615 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 274 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 168 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 387 (C2) HDA temperature 111 83 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 194 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	60.7% Good	Read 115 Write 96.9 Mixed 100 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.41 104% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 62%
External RAID 1.5TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1TB free, PID 0011 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.4% Very poor	Read 34.3 Write 34.8 Mixed 25.7 40% 31.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 0.54 4K Mixed 0.56 40% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 6x4GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 6 of 12 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	53.7% Above average	MC Read 22.7 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 19.8 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 5.9 22% 7.8 GB/s	Latency 58.3 69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback