Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z390 Taichi Ultimate

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Taichi Ultimate  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '19 at 17:30
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 49%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 38.5
2-Core 96.4
48% 73.2 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 696
59% 506 Pts
64-Core 714
44% 714 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.20
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.8% Good
Lighting 71.3
Reflection 84.8
Parallax 84.2
58% 80.1 fps
MRender 99
Gravity 84.2
Splatting 74.6
69% 85.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 5 Volume 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 249 274 194 182 261 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 884
Write 326
Mixed 396
SusWrite 252
102% 464 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 17.1
4K Mixed 18.9
67% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 188
149% 213 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 254%
Samsung MZ7PA128HMCD-010 128GB
231GB free
Firmware: AXM08L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 201 202 200 221 216 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
40% Below average
Read 223
Write 206
Mixed 184
SusWrite 206
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 23.5
4K Mixed 13.4
45% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 73.4
DQ Mixed 27.2
39% 73.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40%
Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$84
463GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 44 49 49 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
40% Below average
Read 94.2
Write 104
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 45.1
55% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
43% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 40%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$80
463GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 44 48 49 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 66.3
Write 90.5
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 45
48% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
47% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 32%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD48GU880-32A160X 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 24.5
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 21.9
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390 Taichi Ultimate Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 151%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Taichi Ultimate

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $934
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback