Acer Predator G3-605

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator G3-605  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G3-605
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140912
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 22 '22 at 19:24
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$125
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 110
2-Core 196
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 588
57% 470 Pts
64-Core 580
36% 580 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
Sapphire(174B 249A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.60
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 12.6
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 10.3
10% 12.6 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 13.4
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
2.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 106 108 107 122 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 84
Write 83
Mixed 39.9
SusWrite 111
58% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 113%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
279GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 34 34 36 35 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 73.3
Write 58.6
Mixed 9.6
SusWrite 32.2
52% 43.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
23% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
56% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 16.8
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 18.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3-605 Builds (Compare 1,569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Acer Predator G3-605

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $125
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback