Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-TRX40 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics92.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive351% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-TRX40 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '19 at 08:36
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 3960X-$484
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 83.1
1-Core 157
2-Core 306
98% 182 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 1,190
103% 881 Pts
64-Core 2,984
185% 2,984 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Lighting 109
Reflection 91.8
Parallax 177
89% 126 fps
MRender 90.6
Gravity 133
Splatting 132
99% 118 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1591 1325 1336 1341 1332 1378 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
351% Outstanding
Read 2,732
Write 2,573
Mixed 1,988
SusWrite 1,384
486% 2,169 MB/s
4K Read 69.8
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 99.4
334% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,231
DQ Write 1,187
DQ Mixed 1,240
923% 1,219 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 351%
Great: 372%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 860 1TB
315GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 101 109 101 107 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 468
Write 413
Mixed 423
SusWrite 97.9
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 32.8
104% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 98.4
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 120
98% 135 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 95%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 860 500GB
344GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 101 109 101 107 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
64% Good
Read 444
Write 414
Mixed 409
SusWrite 97.9
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 32.9
109% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 91
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 110
92% 130 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64%
Great: 98%
Amd-raid Array 3 16TB
7TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 119 128 119 127 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 51.2
Write 78.5
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 115
62% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.3
188% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 230%
Amd-raid Array 4 12TB
9TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 117 109 119 127 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
44% Average
Read 41.3
Write 92
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 111
58% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
134% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44%
Great: 212%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 166 171 169 164 158 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 211
Write 210
Mixed 130
SusWrite 164
238% 179 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 1.4
374% 4.7 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 4.6
DQ Mixed 1.9
224% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 96%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
4TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 168 167 173 167 168 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 175
Mixed 120
SusWrite 169
217% 161 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 1.4
413% 4.97 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 4.6
DQ Mixed 2.2
234% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
207% Outstanding
MC Read 86.1
MC Write 79.3
MC Mixed 84.5
238% 83.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 42.3
90% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 116%
This bench: 207%
Great: 204%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-TRX40 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 179%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 314%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-TRX40 AORUS MASTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $3,368
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback