Acer TravelMate 4200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer TravelMate 4200  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Grapevine
Memory1.5 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20061215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '19 at 11:35
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel T1400
U1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Memory 26.2
1-Core 10.3
2-Core 13.7
13% 16.7 Pts
4-Core 13.8
8-Core 11.1
2% 12.5 Pts
64-Core 16.5
1% 16.5 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9120822AS 120GB-$35
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.ALC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.8 4.6 4 5 5.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.41% Terrible
Read 3.7
Write 3.5
Mixed 3.2
SusWrite 4.7
3% 3.77 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 2.41%
Great: 24%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
52GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 21 7.8 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
9.71% Terrible
Read 29.2
Write 20.9
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 17
25% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.71%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
6.58% Terrible
MC Read 2
MC Write 1.8
MC Mixed 2.1
6% 1.97 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 1.7
6% 2.23 GB/s
Latency 278
14% 278 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.58%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback