Asus H61M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H61M-K  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '19 at 09:01
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G630-$37
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 88.3
1-Core 34.3
2-Core 83.4
47% 68.7 Pts
4-Core 80.3
8-Core 81.7
11% 81 Pts
64-Core 82.7
5% 82.7 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250X
MSI(1462 2715) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Lighting 16.6
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 22.5
14% 18.6 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 18.7
14% 16.3 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
267GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 64 60 86 96 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 93.5
Write 91.5
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 77.8
60% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown FLFE85F-C8KL9 8325 FLFE85F-C8KF9 4GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.3% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 12.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 9
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-K Builds (Compare 2,350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-K - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback