Today's hottest deals

Wortmann_ag 1009641;2120128

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemWortmann_ag 1009641;2120128  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte AB350M-HD3-CF
Memory5.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '22 at 08:24
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 62.9
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 188
64% 116 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 556
53% 436 Pts
64-Core 577
36% 577 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250X
Sapphire(174B E214) 1GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 20.4
Parallax 26.2
14% 21.3 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 14.2
13% 16.5 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD7201Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,094
Write 1,297
Mixed 1212
338% 1,534 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 52
169% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 423
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 365
269% 357 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 249%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
235GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 67 67 67 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 103
Write 99.3
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 66.3
62% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A5244CB0-CRC 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
68.7% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 23.1
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 21.9
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1009641;2120128 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Wortmann_ag 1009641;2120128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback